Key facts
- Starting point
- 50/50 split, adjusted for fairness based on circumstances
- Key factors
- Children's needs, earning capacity, length of marriage
- Legal protection
- Requires a consent order to be binding
What is a financial settlement?
A financial settlement is an agreement about how you’ll divide everything you own when you divorce. It covers:
- Property – the family home and any other properties
- Savings and investments – bank accounts, ISAs, shares, bonds
- Pensions – workplace and private pension schemes
- Debts – mortgages, loans, credit cards, overdrafts
- Other assets – businesses, vehicles, valuable items
- Ongoing support – spousal maintenance and child maintenance
The settlement aims to achieve a fair division that meets both parties’ needs, not necessarily an equal one. What’s “fair” depends entirely on your circumstances.
Divorce and finances are separate
An important point many people miss: getting divorced doesn’t automatically sort out your finances.
Your divorce can be finalised without any agreement about money. But this is risky – without a proper financial order, your ex-spouse could make claims against you years or even decades later.
The famous case of Wyatt v Vince demonstrates this danger. Kathleen Wyatt successfully claimed £300,000 from her ex-husband Dale Vince nearly 20 years after their divorce, because they’d never obtained a financial order.
To properly close the financial chapter of your marriage, you need a court-approved consent order, even if you agree on everything.
How assets are divided
There’s no fixed formula for dividing assets. The court has wide discretion to achieve a fair outcome based on your circumstances.
The starting point
The law starts from a presumption of equality – a 50/50 split – but this is a starting point, not an automatic outcome. The court then considers whether equal division would be fair, given all the circumstances.
Section 25 factors
When deciding what’s fair, courts must consider factors set out in Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973:
The welfare of children – this is the first consideration. If you have children under 18, their housing and financial needs take priority.
Income and earning capacity – what each person earns now, and what they could earn in future. This includes assessing whether someone could realistically return to work or increase their hours.
Financial needs and obligations – what each person needs to live on, including housing, and any other financial responsibilities.
Standard of living – the lifestyle you enjoyed during the marriage. Courts try to minimise the drop in living standards, though this isn’t always possible.
Age and length of marriage – longer marriages typically result in more equal divisions. Short marriages may see each person leaving with what they brought in.
Contributions – both financial (earning money) and non-financial (raising children, running the home). The law treats these as equally valuable.
Conduct – only considered if it would be unfair to ignore it. This is rare and applies to extreme behaviour, not general relationship breakdowns.
Loss of benefits – for example, losing entitlement to a spouse’s pension on divorce.
The three principles
Judges typically apply three overlapping principles:
Needs – the most important factor for most couples. What does each person need to meet their basic requirements, particularly housing?
Compensation – has one person sacrificed their career or earning potential for the benefit of the family? They may deserve compensation for that loss.
Sharing – assets built up during the marriage should generally be shared equally, though non-matrimonial assets (owned before marriage or inherited) may be treated differently.
Matrimonial vs non-matrimonial assets
Assets acquired during the marriage (matrimonial assets) are generally shared. Assets owned before marriage or received as inheritance (non-matrimonial assets) may be ringfenced – but only if there are enough matrimonial assets to meet everyone’s needs. If not, non-matrimonial assets may be included in the division.Common settlement patterns
Every case is different, but some patterns emerge:
Where there are children
The parent with primary care often receives a larger share of the family home (or stays in it) to provide stability for the children. This might mean a 60/40 or 70/30 split of equity, or the home being held until children reach 18.
Where there’s one main earner
The lower-earning spouse typically receives a larger share of capital assets to compensate for their reduced earning capacity, or ongoing spousal maintenance.
Short marriages with no children
Each person may leave with roughly what they brought in, with only assets acquired together being shared.
Long marriages
These tend toward more equal division, regardless of who earned what. Decades of contributions – financial and non-financial – are treated as building shared wealth together.
Reaching agreement
Most couples reach agreement without going to court. Options include:
Direct negotiation – talking between yourselves, perhaps with legal advice in the background.
Mediation – working with a neutral mediator who helps you find common ground.
Solicitor negotiation – having your solicitors negotiate on your behalf.
Collaborative law – both having solicitors, but committing to resolve matters without court.
Whatever route you choose, you should both make full financial disclosure – sharing details of everything you own and owe. Without this, any agreement could later be challenged.
Financial disclosure
Before any agreement can be fair, both parties need to know what’s actually in the pot. This requires full and frank disclosure of:
- Income from all sources
- Property and other real estate
- Bank accounts and savings
- Investments and shares
- Pension valuations (called CETVs)
- Business interests
- Debts and liabilities
- Expected inheritances or windfalls
In court proceedings, this is done through Form E – a detailed 29-page financial statement. Even outside court, similar disclosure is essential.
Don't hide assets
Concealing assets is a serious matter. Courts can overturn settlements years later if hidden assets come to light, and may impose costs penalties or even imprisonment for contempt of court. It’s never worth the risk.Making it legally binding
Once you’ve agreed how to divide things, you need a consent order to make it legally enforceable. This involves:
- Drafting the order – setting out exactly what’s been agreed
- Completing Form D81 – a summary of both parties’ financial positions
- Submitting to court – with the £60 fee
- Judicial approval – a judge checks the agreement is fair
The consent order can only take effect after you have your conditional order (the midpoint of divorce), and ideally before your final order. Once approved, it’s legally binding and enforceable.
Without a consent order, your agreement is just a private arrangement with no legal force.
When you can’t agree
If negotiation fails, you can apply to court for a financial remedy order. This involves:
- Completing Form A (the application)
- Full financial disclosure through Form E
- Attending a First Directions Appointment
- Attempting negotiation at a Financial Dispute Resolution hearing
- If still unresolved, a final hearing where a judge decides
Court proceedings typically take 9-12 months and can be expensive. Most cases settle before the final hearing.
Getting help
Financial settlements can be complex, especially where there are significant assets, pensions, or business interests. Professional advice is valuable for:
- Understanding your entitlements
- Valuing complex assets like pensions or businesses
- Negotiating effectively
- Ensuring agreements are fair and comprehensive
- Drafting legally sound consent orders
A family solicitor can advise on your specific situation, and a mediator can help you reach agreement more amicably.
Need help with your financial settlement?
Most people benefit from professional advice when dividing significant assets. A solicitor can explain your options and help protect your interests.
Find a solicitor →